SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 384

ISMAIL
T. S. Rajam Ammal – Appellant
Versus
V. N. Swaminathan – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Sundaralingam, for Appellant.

ORDER :-

ISMAIL, J.

O. S. No. 51 of 1969 on the file of the court of the Subordinate Judge. Nagapattinam, was instituted for a declaration that the sale deed dated 20-11-1969 executed by one Subramania Pillai in favour of the first defendant and the sale deed dated 20-1-1962 executed by Subramania Pillai in favour of the fourth defendant represented by the third defendant, were not binding on the plaintiff and for recovery of the suit Items 1 to 13 from the 1st defendant and Item 14 from the fifth defendant and Items 15 to 19 from the second defendant. The plaint properties were valued by the plaintiff in the suit in the trial court on the market value as on the date of the plaint and not on the consideration mentioned in the sale deeds. It is against the decree passed in that suit, the second defendant in so far as Items 15 to 19 are concerned had purported to file an appeal on the file of this court. In this appeal, he sought to value the subject-matter of the appeal not on the basis of the market value of the items concerned, but on the basis of the consideration recited in the document canc






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top