SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 77

N.S.RAMASWAMI, P.S.KAILASAM
R. M. S. Shanmugham Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Gian Cheng Kiet – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Gopalachari and G. Krishnan, for Appellants; King and Patridge, for Respondent.

Judgement

N.S. RAMASWAMI, J. :- This civil miscellaneous appeal is against the order of transmission made by the learned District Judge, Ramanathapuram. The respondent before us is a resident of Singapore. He obtained a decree for money in the High Court of Singapore against the appellants in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. A certified copy of the decree passed by the High Court of Singapore was filed before the learned District Judge, Ramnad at Madurai, under Section 44(A), Civil P.C. with a prayer that the decree may be transmitted to the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai, for execution. The appellants before us who are the judgement-debtors raised various objections to the abovesaid application filed by the decree-holder. The learned District Judge. Ramnad, overruled all the objections and ultimately by his order dated 11-7-1969 ordered transmission of the above said foreign decree to the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai. Now, the judgement-debtors in this civil miscellaneous appeal have raised various contentions. However, the learned counsel for the judgement-debtors appellants raised only one contention before us and that is that the decree-holder was debar












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top