SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Mad) 101

VEERASWAMI, VENKATADRI
V. Kannia Lal – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Nagaraja Rao, for Appellants; Govt. Pleader, for Respondents.

Judgement

VEERASWAMI, J. : Claimants 1 to 11 in the land acquisition proceedings are the appellants. A total extent of 3 cawnies, 7 grounds and 661 sq. ft. comprised in R. S. 2381/88 in Mylapore was acquired compulsorily under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act for construction of quarters for the staff of the police department. The notification under S. 4(1) of the Act was made on 29-1-1958. On the basis of a sale dated 11-5-1957, of an extent of 2046 sq. ft. for Rs. 2500 in R. S. 2195/1, 4 and 5 in Mylapore, which works out at the rate of Rs. 2932 per ground, the Land Acquisition Officer allowed compensation at the rate of Rs. 2130 per ground, after deducting 25 per cent of the area for providing roads and Rs. 800 per ground for meeting the cost of laying roads. He awarded Rs. 1,26,642-70 nP. at that rate for the extent of two cawnies, 11 grounds and 1096 sq. ft. On a reference to the City Civil Court, under S. 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, the learned Assistant Judge of that court raised the compensation payable for the land abutting the bazar road to Rs. 3000 per ground and for the rest at the rear of it to Rs. 2200 per ground. He also reduced the extent to be allowed










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top