SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Mad) 262

NATESAN
Rangaswami Reddiar – Appellant
Versus
Gunnammal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Desikan, for Petitioner; S. Sethuratnam, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This revision has been preferred by the plaintiff in a Civil suit against whom an order has been passed by the learned District Munsif, Kulitalai, directing the filing of a complaint under S. 476 Cri. P.C. for an enquiry into offences under Ss. 193 and 209 I.P.C. against the plaintiff on motion made by the defendant. The learned District Judge, Tiruchirapalli, on appeal, has confirmed the order.

2. The facts leading to the proceedings may be set out briefly. The petitioner herein, the plaintiff, against whom the complaint is to be laid, is the deceased husband's Brother of the respondent herein, the defendant in the suit which the petitioner laid. The suit, O. S. 588 of 1959, on the file of the District Munsif's court, Kulatalai was for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2000 due on a promissory note dated 1-1-1958. It was the case of the plaintiff that this amount was advanced by him to the defendant for the purchase of a land by her for Rs. 3000, Ex. B. 1 being the sale deed. According to the plaintiff, he had a sum of Rs. 1000 belonging to his brother with him.

This suit was contested by the defendant and she put forward a plea that she did not execute any promissory note























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top