SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 227

J. C. SHAH, K. SUBBA RAO, K. N. WANCHOO, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Babu Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

SHAH, J.: Jairam and three others- hereafter collectively called "the plaintiffs" -sued Babu Lal- appellant in this appeal-in the Court of the Munsiff, Koil District Aligarh, for a decree for possession of a strip of land, for removal of a wall and slab of stone and for an injunction restraining the making of certain constructions in the northern wall of the plaintiffs house. The plaintiffs claimed that Mohini wife of Jairam the first plaintiff had purchased the house occupied by them by sale deed dated August 1, 1932 from the vendor who was also named Mohini, who in her turn had purchased the house by sale deed dated July 25, 1917 from the original owner Kishan Lal.

2. Babu Lal who is the son of Kishan Lal pleaded that the vendor Mohini had acquired only a life interest in the house of by the deed under which the property was conveyed to her by Kishan Lal and the plaintiff s precesessor-in-interest had acquired no title under the sale deed dated August 1, 1932. In support of this plea Babu Lal gave evidence at the trial of the suit and tendered in evidence an agreement dated July 25, 1917 purported to be executed by Mohini to whom Kishan Lal had conveyed the house reciting

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top