S. Mohan, J.

1. The revision, lies in a short compass. The tenant aggrieved about the concurrent orders has preferred this revision. The respondent-landlady filed the petition for eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement for own occupation of the non-residential premises bearing door No. 201, Appa Rao Gardens, Sydenhams Road, Madras-7. The monthly rent is Rs. 1,000 for the non-residential purpose. The respondent's husband is carrying on timber business under the name and style of Ashok Timber Corporation in a rented premises at No. 196, Appa Rao Gardens, Sydenhams Road, Madras-7. Hence the requirement is bona fide. A notice was issued on 18th September, 1978, terminating the tenancy by the end of March, 1979, calling upon the revision petitioner to vacate and surrender possession, to which there has been neither a reply, nor compliance with the demand. Thus, the petition for eviction.

2. In the counter of the revision petitioner, it was contended that the respondent owns a non-residential building in the City of Madras and, therefore, is not entitled to the relief asked for, for the purpose of her husband's business. The revision-petitioner has established his business