RATNAVEL PANDIAN
Jagannathan – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
Ratnavel Pandian, J.
1. This revision is preferred by accused 1 to 4 in Crime No. 49/81 of Ponneri Police Station, registered under Sections 448, 341 and 323, I.P.C. challenging the legality of the order passed by the learned Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Ponneri, before whom the above said case is pending, rejecting the prayer of the accused in Crl. M. P. No. 1216/82 seeking the stoppage of further proceedings in the matter on the ground that the investigation in that case, which is a summons case, had not been concluded within a period of six months from the date of their arrest, as contemplated under Section 167 (5), Cr. P. C and seeking an order striking off the charge-sheet and discharging the accused.
2. The learned Magistrate has dismissed the said application on the following grounds, viz., (1) that the perusal of the charge-sheet discloses that the occurrence took place on 2-3-1981 and that the investigating officer had completed his investigation by 6-5-1981, (2) that the delay in sending the charge-sheet and the records to the Court on 5-3-1982 (sic 9-3-82) had occasioned due to the fact that the medical officer had given her opinion about the nature of the injury
14. K. S. Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra (1972) 3 SCR 510: 1972 Cri LJ 593.
2. Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary 1980 SCC (Cri) 23 : (1980) 1 SCC 81.
1. Alladi Venkateswarlu v. Govt. of A.P. (1978)41 S.T.C. 394 : 1978 Tax L.R. 2049.
8. H. Khatoon v. Home Secretary 1980 SCC (Cri) 35 : (1980) 1 SCC 93 : 1979 Cri LJ 1036.
11. Sailendra Nath v. State of Bihar AIR 1968 SC 1292 : 1968 Cri LJ 1484.
15. Hussainara Khatoon v. State (1979) 3 SCR 760 : 1979 Cri LJ 1052.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.