Srinivasan, J.

1. The tenant is the revision Petitioner. The respondents are sisters. They are the owners of the petition buildings, having purchased the same under a document dated 27-3-1982. The petition for eviction was filed under Section 10(2)(i) - wilful default in payment of rent, Section 10(2)(ii)(b) -user of the building for a different purpose, Section 10(2)(v)-guilty of nuisance to the occupiers of other portions in the same building or buildings in the neighbourhood, Section 10(3)(i)-requirement for own occupation and Section 10(3)(c)-additional accommodation, under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.

2. The Rent Controller rejected the grounds of wilful default in payment of rent and additional accommodation. On appeal by the tenant, the Appellate Authority confirmed the order of eviction of the Rent Controller with regard to one more ground, viz. requirement for additional accommodation.

3. In this revision petition, learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the evidence on record does not make out the case of using the building for a purpose other than that for which it was leased out and thereby