P.SATHASIVAM, S.K.KRISHNAN
Union of India represented by its Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil Nadu-I, Chennai and another – Appellant
Versus
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Branch, represented by its Registrar, High Court Building, Chennai and another – Respondent
2. The brief facts which are required for the disposal of the writ petition are stated hereunder: The second respondent herein was working as Income Tax Officer in the Government of India. On 29.1.1 985 there was a raid on the applicant and on the basis of subsequent proceedings, criminal action was initiated on 25.4.1988 and the same was taken on file of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge as C.C.No.6 of 1988 and subsequently the proceedings were transferred to the Court of Special Judge for C.B.I. cases and registered as C.C.No.19 of 1997. On 26.10.1992, the Department also initiated disciplinary proceedings by framing four Articles of charges. It is the case of the 2nd respondent/ applicant that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.