ORDER: The revision petition is filed by the landlady represented by power of attorney agent challenging the fair and decretal orders in R.C.A.No.1 of 1994 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge), Chengalpattu reversing the fair and decretal orders passed by the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Madurantakam in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 1993.

2. The petition under Sec.10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960) was laid for eviction of the tenant/respondent from the petition premises on the ground of bona fide requirement of the premises for carrying on the business of the grandson of the landlady. The respondent resisted the claim of the petitioner on the ground that the same is not bona fide. The learned Rent Controller having analysed the evidence adduced on either side and after considering the arguments held that the claim made by the landlady is bona fide. The respondent preferred the appeal before the Rent Control Appellate Authority and the learned Subordinate Judge having analysed the evidence on record and upon hearing the arguments of both sides allowed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document