K.SAMPATH
Gengadurai naicker and another – Appellant
Versus
A. Chockalingam and another – Respondent
2. The first respondent herein filed the suit for specific performance and direction to defendants 1 to 3 to execute a sale deed in respect of the suit property in his favour on payment of the balance of sale consideration by him on the following averments:
On 21.12.1981 he entered into an agreement with the first defendant for purchasing three items of properties, namely 1.68 acres in S.No.725/2A, 0.2 acre in S.No.725/2C, and 0.3 acre in S.No.275/2D for a total consideration of Rs.11,250. He paid Rs.2,500 as advance and subsequently paid amounts, in all Rs.6,200 to the first defendant. He has always been ready and willing to get the sale completed. The first defendant has been evading. He had executed a power of attorney in favour of the second defendant and in pursuance of the same the suit property had been conveyed to the third defendant collusively. The third defendant knew about the agreement for sale in favour of the plaintiff. He, after his p
Sidramappa v. Rajashetty [1970] 1 S.C.J. 857; A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 1059
T. N. Linga Gounder v. Kappa Gowder : [1976] 1 M.L.J. 363
M. S. Velappan v. K. S. Goapalakrishnan [1993] 1 L.W. 493
Shoba Viswanathan v. D. P. Kingsley : [1996] 2 M.L.J. 96
Kulwant Karu v. Gurdial Singh Mamn A.I.R. 2001 S.C. 1273; [2001] 4 S.C.C. 262
N. Dhanalakshi and others v. S. Ekananthan : [1998] 1 M.L.J. 132
Vidyanadam v. Vairam A.I.R. 1997 S.C. 1751
R. S. Senthamaraikannan v. The Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal for Tamil Nadu, Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.