SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 1686

R.BANUMATHI
Angammal – Appellant
Versus
Ramasamy and others – Respondent


Advocates:
P.Peppin Fernando, for Petitioner.
M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates, for Respondents.

ORDER: C.R.P.No.2854 of 2001: This revision is directed against the order of Sub Court, Kulithalai in I.A.No.220 of 2000 in A.S.SR.No.302 of 2000 (18.4.2001) dismissing the Application filed under Secs.148-A and 151, C.P.C. to set aside the order passed on 27.10.2000.

C.R.P.No.2855 of 2001: This revision is directed against the order of Sub Court, Kulithalai in I.A.No.221 of 2000 in A.S.SR. No.302 of 2000 (dated 18.4.2001) of dismissing the application seeking for extension of time for payment of cost.

2. Relevant facts briefly be stated thus:

Revision petitioner/D-1 is pitted against her husband. She is the first wife of the first respondent/Ramasamy. Saroja and Jeyalakshmi are their daughters. Plaintiffs/respondents 1 and 2 viz., Ramasamy and his second wife Angammal filed suit in O.S.No.34 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kulithalai for Permanent Injunction restraining revision petitioner/D-1 and her men from interfering with plaintiffs possession of the suit properties. Suit properties relate to landed properties in Sithalaivai village. The suit was decreed on 23.3.2000.

3. A.S.SR.No.302 of 2000 and I.A.No.104 of 2000: Revision petitioner/D-1 preferred this appeal with

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top