A.RAMAMURTHI
Poonu alias Kondappa Naicker and another – Appellant
Versus
Marammal and another – Respondent
2. The case in brief is as follows: The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and consequential permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. The suit property belong to the plaintiffs, which was allotted to the 2nd plaintiff’s grandfather Nallusamy in the family partition, Nallusamy Naicker had 3 brothers namely, Ramaswamy Naicker, Venkata Naicker and Chinnu Naicker. All the 4 brothers have divided among themselves the joint family properties into 4 shares nearly 40 years ago and each were in separate possession and enjoyment of the respective shares. The plaintiffs are the heirs of Nallusamy Naicker. The 2nd plaintiff is the son of the 1st plaintiff. The 2nd defendant is the son of the 1st defendant and they are the heirs of Ramasamy Naicker. Venkata Naicker had alienated his share long ago. Chinnu Naicker has got a son by name Vellappa Naicker who is alive. The total extent of S.F.No.383/1 in Vaiyampatti village is 28.56 acres. In this, one Subba Naicker is having ancestral right with regard to an extent of 5.42 acres on the eastern portion. The remaining extent of 23.14 acres belonged to
Krishna Chandra v. Ramamurthy Pantulu : [1951] 2 M.L.J. 325
P. Mariyamumma v. P. Ummar Kutti A.I.R. 1952 Mad. 852 : [1952] 1 M.L.J. 43
Ram Saran v. Ganga Devi A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 2685
Palaniswamy Gounder v. Varadaraja Perumal Temple [1997] 2 L.W. 343 : [1997] 1 M.L.J. 381
Ponnuswami v. Mariappa Servai 1943 M.W.N. 106; A.I.R. 1943 Mad. 106 : [1943] 2 M.L.J. 658
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.