P.THANGAVEL
K. Selvam – Appellant
Versus
Visalam Chit Fund Limited, Srivilliputhur, represented by its Branch Manager and others – Respondent
2. The facts that are necessary for disposal of the civil revision petition are as follows: The second respondent herein is the owner of the property described as fourth item in the execution petition in E.P.No.257 of 1996 and the said property was brought to sale in Court auction in execution of the decree obtained by one Lakshmi against the second respondent herein in O.S.No.72 of 1986 on the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur for the amount due under a promissory note from the second respondent herein to the abovesaid Lakshmi. The demised property was sold in Court auction in E.P.No.15 of 1989 in O.S.No.72 of 1986 on 4.2.1994 and the said property was purchased by one Tamilselvam admittedly for a sum of Rs.12,000. The sale was admittedly confirmed on 29.4.1994 and a sale certificate was issued in favour of Tamilselvam by the Execution Court. The above Tamilselvam sold the demised property in favour
Kedarnath Lal v. Sheonarai A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 1717; [1970] 2 S.C.R. 204
Sambanda Mudaliar v. Muthuswami Mudaliar : [1989] 1 M.L.J. 414
A. M. E. P. Mohammed Ismail v. S. A. S. Alagappa Chettiar : [1977] 1 M.L.J. 76
M. N. Nagendran Chettiar v. Lakshmi Ammal A.I.R. 1933 Mad. 583 (F.B.) : 65 M.L.J. 108
Jayarama Mudaliar v. Ayyasami A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 569; [1973] 1 Supreme. 158
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.