SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 436

A.S.VENKATACHALA MOORTHY
Pavayammal – Appellant
Versus
Komarasami and others – Respondent


Advocates:
P.Mathivannan, for Appellant.
N.Manoharan, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT: One Pavayammal (plaintiff) filed a suit against the respondents herein (D-2, D-4, D-1 and D-5 respectively) and one Marayee Ammal (D-3, since dead) in O.S. No.125 of 1983 on the file of District Munsif Court, Bhavani praying the Court to pass a decree directing the defendants to pay her enhanced maintenance at the rate of Rs.250 per month towards her food, clothing and residence from the date of suit throughout her lifetime and for further decree directing the properties described in the schedule annexed to the plaint over which a charge for the proper payment of the maintenance at the previous rate had already been created in O.S. No.171 of 1965 on the file of District Munsif Court, Erode will continue to remain charged for the proper payment of the enhanced maintenance and for other reliefs.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that she is the wife of the first defendant and the marriage was celebrated in the year 1962. The first defendant fell into the bad company of one Chennarayan and Natesan and started to ill-treat the plaintiff and finally she was deserted. With a view to deprive the plaintiff for her maintenance rights, the first defendant conveyed his immovable proper

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top