ORDER: Both the above civil revision petitions have been filed by one and the same parties, viz., the 11th and 12 defendants in the suit, as against the sole plaintiff and these defendants No.11 and 12 have filed two applications before the lower Court the first one in I.A. No.641 of 1998 in the pending suit in O.S. No.104 of 1995 and the second one in I.A. No.655 of 1998 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Devakottai.

2. I.A. No.641 of 1998 has been filed by defendants No.11 and 12 under O.9, Rule 7, C.P.C. seeking to set aside the ex parte order dated 9.9.1997 and the other I.A. No.655 of 1998 has been filed under Sec.151, C.P.C. seeking to appoint some other advocate- Commissioner to inspect the suit property and to file a report with plan, in the place of the advocate- Commissioner already appointed by the Court. The lower Court has passed individual orders in both those applications and since both the applications have been filed by one and the same parties to the suit against the same plaintiff and since being forming part of the same suit, both the above civil revision petitions are heard together and this common order is passed.

3. The petitioners would file their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document