ORDER: The revision petitioner is the petitioner in I.A. No.397 of 1999 and the third defendant in O.S. No.32 of 1998 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.

2. Before the settlement of issues between the parties in the above suit, the revision petitioner filed I.A. No.397 of 1999 under O.13, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking permission to produce the documents that are provided in the list accompanied in the above application, submitting that the same could not be traced earlier and therefore, could not be produced. However, the respondent/ plaintiff objected to the permission on the grounds that the first document was not registered and therefore, no right could flow under the same in favour of the revision petitioner, that the second document was a fabricated one for the purpose of the case and the respondent/ plaintiff is not a party in the alleged arrangement made under the second document and that, in any event, the documents 3 to 8 are not related to the suit properties.

3. Learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai, by order dated 6.12.1999, rejected the permission holding that the revision petitioner ought to have produ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document