The above civil revision petition is directed against the judgment and decree dated 12. 1995 made in R.C.A.No.53 of 1992 by the Rent Control Appellate Authority and the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem thereby dismissing the said appeal and confirming the fair and decretal order dated 18. 1992 made in R.C.O.P.No.9 of 1990 by the Rent Controller and the Additional District Munsif, Salem.

.2. Regarding the facts, it is the landlady, who filed the petition before the Rent Controller under Sec.10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, seeking the eviction of the tenant on ground of requiring the premises for her additional accommodation. On her part, the landlady would allege in her rent control application that she purchased the petition property on 18. 1989 and even prior to her purchase, her husband was running a shoe-mart in the petition premises thus making use of the same for non-residential purposes; that the respondent is in occupation, as the tenant, of a portion of the petition is in occupation, as the tenant, of a portion of the petition premises measuring 3’ × 10’ running a watch repair shop therein; that the tenant in spite of in