Tenant originally filed this revision, and after his death, his legal representatives have been brought on record, and they have further prosecuted the revision.

.2. Eviction was ordered by the authorities below on the ground that the building is required by the landlord for demolition and reconstruction.

.3. I heard this revision and dismissed the same as per my order dated 19. 1996. Against my decision, the matter was taken before the Honourable Supreme Court, and before the Honourable Supreme Court, a submission was made by the revision petitioners that during the pendency of the revision, the original landlord has sold the property to a third party and the subsequent sale will have material bearing in the result of the revision petition. It was also submitted before the Honourable Supreme Court that the tenants came to know about the same only after the disposal of the revision. When such submission was made, their Lordships of the Supreme Court held thus:

.“Learned counsel states that during the pendency of the revision petition before the High Court, the respondent/landlord sold the property in dispute. According to the learned counsel, with the sale of the prop