SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 348

RAJU, V.KANAGARAJ
Parvathi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Solai Ammal and another – Respondent


Advocates:
M.N.Muthukumaran for Appellant. K.Raghunathan, for Respondents.

Judgment :-

Raju. J.

The above appeal has been filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 23. 1994 in,A.S.No.454 of 1982 whereunder the learned Judge has chosen to allow the appeal, in part which has been filed by the defendants in O.S.N0.138 of l980 on me file of Sub Courts, Cuddalore, confirming the judgment of the trial Court in respect of other portion.

2. The appellant in the appeal, who is the daughter of one Kesava, Padayachi and, Solaianimal, the 1st defendant herein, is also the sister of the 2nd defendant. She filed a suit for partition and separate pos-session of her l/3rd share in suit schedule properties.Tthe suit A schedule property comprised four parts consisting of various items of immovable properties and suit B schedule consisting of movables as described therein.

3. The case of the plaintiff as per the averments in the plaint is that the suit properties belonged to her father Kesava Padayachi who died on 30.5.1979, mat the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant are the daughter and son of the said Kesava Padayachi and the 1st defendant and mat Kesava Padayachi died intestate. The further case of the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top