K.GOVINDARAJAN
M. K. Sankaran – Appellant
Versus
S. Birlasekaran and another – Respondent
1. The tenant who suffered an order of eviction before the authorities below has filed the above revision.
2. The landlords/petitioner filed R.C.O.P. No. 381 of 1981 under Sections 10(2)(i) and 14(1)(b) of the Act 18 of 1960. According to them, the rent was at Rs.220 per month and the tenant respondent paid an advance of Rs. 1,000. The landlords got the property in question by virtue of a registered partition deed dated 111. 1980 entered into between the landlords and their brothers. According to them, the tenant has paid rent irregularly till the end of September, 1980 and failed to pay the subsequent months rent despite the repeated demands made by the landlords through their agents, and the arrears of rent was Rs. 1,760 for the period from October, 1980 to the end of May, 1981. On that basis they came forward with the plea that the tenant had committed wilful default in payment of rent. They also wanted the premises in question for demolition and reconstruction. The tenant contested the eviction petition by filing a detailed counter. The learned Rent Controller, Principal District Munsif, Madurai accepting the case of the landlords ordered eviction on both the grounds
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.