SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 1538

K.SAMPATH
RAJAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMASAMI – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:M. Kandaswamy, Pushpa Sathyanarayanan, T.R.Rajaraman, Advocates.

Judgment :

K. SAMPATH, J.

( 1 ) - S. A. No. 575 of 1984 has been filed against the decision in A. S. No. 77 of 1982 on the file of the District Court, periyar, which was against C. S. No 762 of 1981 on the file of District Munsifs Court, erode. The plaintiff in the suit, who succeeded before the trial court and lost before the lower appellate court is the appellant.

( 2 ) S. A. No. 582 of 1984 has been filed against A. S. No. 117 of 1982 on the file of the District Court, Periyar, which was filed against O. S. No. 1106 of 1981 on the file of the District Munsifs Court, Erode. Plaintiffs in o. S. No. 1106 of 1981 who succeeded before the trial court and lost before the lower appellate court filed the second appeal. Pending the second appeal, the second appellant died and the third appellant was brought on record as her legal representative. Defendants 1 to 3 were the same in both the suits. The first defendant Rangasami died pending the first appeals. The third defendant did not contest the suit.

( 3 ) THERE was a joint trial in the two suits. Evidence was common as also the judgment. There were two appeals by the defeated defendants 1 and 2 and there was a common judgment by the a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top