SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 1051

SRINIVASAN
Mayalagu Ambalam and Others – Appellant
Versus
KR. PR. Karuppiah Ambalam (died) and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
P.N.Narasimha Iyer, for Appellants. B.Rajagopalan, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

Judgment :

This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the 1st respondent in appeal (who died subsequent to the filing of the appeal) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and the villagers of Eluvankottai Serkai from interfering with the worshipping as the first person and receiving thiruneeru and theertham on the days of Maduyeduppu and the eye opening ceremony for mud horses on the Kuthiraiyeduppu day when the said festivals are conducted for Vadakkuvasal Chellayee Amman Koil and Poduru Ayyanar Koil alias Sevugu Perumal Ayyanar Koil in Eluvankottai and Poduvayal revenue village.

.2. The plaint ran as follows: In the villages commonly known as ‘Pananthope Serkai’, the plaintiff was entitled to certain preferential rights in temples and certain honours in Pananthope and Eluvankottai Serkais, which were exercised by the plaintiff and his ancestors from time immemorial. Eluvankottai Serkai Village consisted of Eluvankottai Maduvikottai, Perivayal and Maruthani and Pahadi villages. In the village of Eluvankottai, there is a temple known as Vadakuvasal Chelliamman koil and another temple by name PoduvudiarAyyanar Koil alias Sovuga Perumal Ayyanar Koil in Perivayal. Festiva




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top