SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 775

ABDUL HADI
Rajeswari – Appellant
Versus
Dhanammal – Respondent


Advocates:
P.Devadass, for Petitioner. S.Balasubramanian, for Respondent.

Judgment :

The defendant is the petitioner in this civil revision petition against the reversing judgment dated 9. 1992 in C.M.A.No.29 of 1992 on the file of the 2nd Additional City Civil Court, Madras, by the respondent/ plaintiff, whereby the lower appellate court has dismissed I.A.No.12454 of 1981 filed by the petitioner herein in the. trial court in O.S.No.4059 of 1979 for purchase of the suit land under Sec.9 of the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2. The said suit O.S.No.4059 of 1979 is by the respondent for ejectment of the petitioner from the suit land of an extent of 3,086 sq.ft., claiming that one 50’ x 141/2’ land is in the abovesaid 3,086 sq.ft., land was leased out to the petitioner under Ex.A-1 agreement dated 16. 1975, but the petitioner had trespassed into the other remaining portion of the said suit property. In the said suit, the petitioner filed written statement, inter alia, claiming that the entire 3,086 sq.ft., was leased out along with the shed thereon and that the signature of the petitioner was obtained in Ex.A-1 only on misrepresentation or without letting her know about the contents of the said agreement.

3.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top