THANIKKACHALAM
T. Anandan – Appellant
Versus
Noorjahan – Respondent
The tenant is the petitioner. The petition for eviction was filed under Secs.l0(2)(ii)(b), 10 (2)(iii) and 10(3)(a)(iii) of Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973. Ultimately, the only one ground that arises for consideration in this revision is the eviction sought for under Sec.l0(3)(a)(iii) of the Act.
2 The respondent here in is the owner of the entire premises at No.7, Thayar Sahib Road, Mount Road, Madras-2 and the petitioner herein is the tenant under the landlady is respect of the petition premises on a monthly rent of Rs.200. According to the landlady, though the petition premises was let out to the tenant for the purpose of his residence, the tenant is using the same for non-residential purpose. According to the landlady, the tenant installed in the petition premises a commercial banking even deliberately and thereby caused damage to the ceiling of the building. The landlady is residing at premises No.34, Veerasami Pillai Street, Egmore, Madras-8, which is a rented premises. The landlady is also carrying on a business under the name and style of Asian Enterprices in the 2nd Floor of premise old No.200/210, Triplicane High Road and present D.No.75, Quide Mil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.