SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 26

PRATAP SINGH
S. KIRAN – Appellant
Versus
L. C. CORPORATION – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:A.P. Suryaprakasam, Udairaj Gulecha, Advocates.

Judgment :

PRATAP SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THE accused in C. C. 9502/89 on the file of VII Metropolitan magistrate, George Town, Madras has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr. PC. , praying to call for the records in the above case and quash the same.

( 2 ) SHORT facts are: The respondent has filed a private complaint against the petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act (which I shall hereinafter refer to as the Act ). The allegations in it are briefly as follows: the complainant sold and delivered goods to the accused during October to December 1988. After giving credit to the various part payments made by the accused, a sum of Rs. 59,363. 16 Ps. and interest was found due. In respect of the debt, the accused issued five cheques, totalling to Rs. 60,684. 16 Ps. when the said cheques were presented for encashment, they were returned dishonoured and thereafter once again at the request and the assurance given by the accused, the complainant presented it for encashment. Then again, the cheques were returned with remarks "refer to drawer". The Complainant received the intimation of the return on 5. 10. 89 and 13. 10. 89. The complainant issued lawyers notice on










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top