SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 632

GOVARDHAN
P. Ranganathan and eight Others – Appellant
Versus
Sai Jagannathan and nine Others – Respondent


Judgment :-

O.A.No.123 of 1995 is an application for injunction in which the applicant has stated that the suit is one for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the applicants possession and enjoyment of the suit properties and the respondents who have no manner of right whatsoever in respect of the properties and who are not in possession of the properties, are attempting to commit trespass into the suit properties and therefore, interim injunction has to be granted.

2. Interim injunction was granted when this application was moved on 2. 1995 for a period of four weeks. The said order was subsequently modified to the effect that status quo as on 22. 1995 has to be maintained. The respondents have filed Appln. No.1071 of 1995 for vacating the ex parte order of injunction and Appln. No.1072 of 1995 for interim suspension of the ex parte order of injunction.

3. In the above applications which have been in the form of a counter-affidavit to O.A. No.123 of 1995 apart from stating their case that the respondents have also pleaded that the suit is not maintainable, the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs Mrs.Chitra Sampath has argued that since t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top