SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 940

K.VENKATARAMAN
E. P. M. Naina Mohamed – Appellant
Versus
A. Abdul Azeez – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:K.A. Basheer Ahamed, Advocate. For the Respondent:P. Gopalan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The respondent in A.S.No.45 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur is the appellant in this appeal. The appellant therein is the respondent in the present appeal.

2. The respondent herein has filed the suit in O.S.No.109 of 1995 originally on the file of the District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai for declaration of title and for possession of the suit property. Later, due to bifurcation of the District, the suit was transferred to the file of the District Munsif, Nannilam and renumbered as O.S.No.117 of 1999. The appellant herein being the defendant in the said suit filed written statement denying the averments made in the plaint. After considering the entire evidence on record, the learned District Munsif, Nannilam (hereinafter referred as the "Trial Court") dismissed the suit holding that the respondent herein is not entitled for the relief of declaration of title and for possession. The respondent herein therefore filed an appeal before the Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur in A.S.No.45 of 2005. During the pendency of the said appeal, the respondent herein has filed two applications in I.A.Nos.46 and 48 of 2006, one to receive additional documents and the other t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top