V. Ramasubramanian, J.

Application No.2450 of 2007 is an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C., to reject the plaint in C.S. No. 590 of 2006 and Application No.2894 of 2006 is an application to revoke the leave to sue granted to the plaintiff in Application No.2726 of 2006 in C.S. No. 590 of 2006, by an order dated 8. 2006. Both these applications have been taken out by the second defendant.

2. I have heard Mr. K. Parasaran, learned senior counsel appearing for the appli-cant/second defendant and Mr. T.V. Ramanujun, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff.

3. The facts leading to the institution of the above suit, as culled out from the plaint are as follows:

.(a) that the plaintiff is an Association registered under The Uttar Pradesh (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Association) Act, 2005, having its Registered Office at Lucknow and it claims to be the Central Body for the Control of the Game of Cricket in the State of Uttar Pradesh;

.(b) that the first defendant is the Board of Control for Cricket in India (B.C.C.I.) which is a body controlling the Game of Cricket in India;

.(c) that the second defendant (the applicant in this a