P.K.MISRA, R.BANUMATHI
Sree Kamatchi Amman Constructions rep. By its Partner cum Power of Attorney Holder, & Another – Appellant
Versus
The Divisional Railway Manager/Works, Palghat Division, Southern Railway, Palghat, Kerala, & Others – Respondent
R. Banumathi, J.
These intra-Court Appeals are preferred against the common order made in O.P.Nos.446/2002 and 78/2003, dismissing the original Petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
2. Both the appeals arise out of common order. Since common points fall for consideration, both the appeals were heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. For convenience, M/s.Sree Amman Constructions is referred as Claimant/Contractor and the Railway Administration/Department is referred as Railway.
.3. Brief facts which led to the arbitration are as follows :¬
.The Southern Railways called for tenders on 01.06.1995 in respect of the work "JTJ-ED Section : contractor 12.54 Kms. CTR of Exg.90R/52 kg. Railways laid on CST.9/Wooden sleepers to 11.7 density with now 60 Kg/52 Kg.Rails on PSC Sleepers with elastic fastening between Km.219/31-231/3-U/L with PQRS equipment". Contractor submitted its quotation for the above said work and the same was accepted by the Railway. Formal Agreement was entered into with the Railway bearing No.J/487/95 on 011. 1995 with the currency period of three months from 210. 1995 to 25.01.1996 for execution of work i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.