V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Vandhana – Appellant
Versus
T. Srikanth and Krishnamachari – Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian, J.
1. Pending Suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing or interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property, the plaintiff has come up with the present Application for an interim order of injunction of similar nature.
2. I have heard Mr. V. Lakshmi Narayanan, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/plaintiff and Mr. S.M. Loganathan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/defendants.
3. A marriage purportedly solemnised at the Venugopala Swamy Temple, Kakinada, East Godavari on 2. 2007 between the applicant/plaintiff and the first respondent/first defendant, was registered in the Office of the Marriage Registrar, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, under the Hindu Marriage Act. It appears that the members of the families of the applicant/plaintiff and the first respondent/first defendant also decided to have a formal ceremonial social wedding on 16. 2007. But on 16. 2007, the respondents/defendants lodged a police Complaint against the applicant and her parents before the Commissioner of Police, Chennai and later before R-8, All Women Police Station, Vadapalani, claimi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.