SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 2962

S.MANIKUMAR
Muthuraman – Appellant
Versus
Muthukumaran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Ms. R. Meenal, Advocate. For the Respondent: --

Judgment :

S. Manikumar, J.

Challenging the order of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore, in I.A. No. 1614 of 2005 in O.S. No. 913 of 2004 dated 18. 2005, the petitioner has come forward with this Civil Revision Petition.

2. Brief facts leading to the Civil Revision Petition are as follows:

(i) The respondent/plaintiff filed a Suit in O.S. No. 913 of 2004 on the file of the District Court, Cuddalore, for judgment and decree against the defendant/petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.17,411.50 together with Principal and interest of Rs.15,000/- and costs, on the basis of a promissory note which said to have been executed on 1. 2003 by the revision petitioner/defendant in favour of the plaintiff/respondent, in which, the revision petitioner/defendant agreed to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- together with interest at the rate of Rs.100/- per Re.1/- either to the plaintiff/respondent or to the person, nominated by him on demand. In spite of repeated demands through the associates of the respondent/plaintiff to repay the amount as mentioned in the promissory note, the revision petitioner/defendant failed to do so, thereby causing unnecessary delay. The respondent/plaintiff contended that as per t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top