R.SUDHAKAR
R. Mohan Ranganathan & Another – Appellant
Versus
The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram & Others – Respondent
1. Writ Petition No.21450 of 2008is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.4/30849/2007 dated
15. 2008, confirming the order of the second respondent made in Na.Ka.No.179/2007 dated 26. 2007 and direct the second respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner by effecting changes in the UDR for the property situated at S.No.223/2, 1.38 acres, Padur Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
2. Writ Petition No.15851 of 2009is filedto issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the review petition dated 30.3.2009 filed against the orders in Na.Ka.No.4/30849/2007 dated 15. 2008 after giving opportunity to all the parties.
3. Mr.Mohan Ranganathan, the petitioner in W.P.No.21450 of 2008 and Mr.S.A.Bhimaraja, the petitioner in W.P.No.15851 of 2009 claim certain rights over the property in Survey No.223/2, Padur Village, Chengalpattu Taluk in Patta No.65 which originally stood in the name of one Mr.Gulam Rasool Sahib.
4. Mr.Mohan Ranganathan, the petitioner in W.P.No.21450 of 2008 challenges the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, the first
Sawarni (Smt) vs. - Inder Kaur (Smt) and othersreported in (1996)6 Supreme Court Cases 223
Bramhanand Rai v. Dy. Director of Consolidation (AIR 1987 ALL. 100
Arukkani Ammal v. Guruswamy [(1987)100 LW 707 (2007)8 SCC 329 2007(8) SCC 329 1995 MLJ 426
Kuppuswami Nainar – vs. - The District Revenue Officer
Saroja – vs. - Chinnusamy (dead) by LRs. and another reported in (2007)8 Supreme Court Cases 329
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.