The revision petitioner/4th respondent/4th defendant has filed this civil revision petition as against the order dated 210. 2008 in I.A.No.17871 of 2008 in O.S.No.7380 of 2008 passed by the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in granting the relief of ad-interim injunction till 011. 2008.

2. The trial Court, while passing orders in I.A.No.17871 of 2008 in O.S.No.7380 of 2008, has granted the relief of ad-interim injunction till 011. 2008 and ordered notice to respondent by then, etc.

3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner urges before this Court that the order of the trial Court in granting the relief of ad-interim injunction without assigning reasons are vitiated in law and that the trial Court should have been more cautious in interfering with the management of temple since the idol is a minor and its interest has to be safeguarded first and that the trial Court has erred in taking the suit to its file as the cause of action has arisen only in Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District and moreover, the trial Court has permitted the 4th respondent/petitioner/plaintiff to select a Court of his choice, which is against the principles of natural