A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
P. Kannaiah – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Chinnaraj – Respondent
1. The concurrent finding of the Rent Controller in R.C.O.P. No.187 of 2003 and the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority in R.C.A. No.61 of 2006 under Section 19(2) (1) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings( Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") for an order of eviction is under challenge before this Court under this Revision.
2. The facts in brief in the Petition filed by the landlord in R.C.O.P. No.187 of 2003 before the learned Rent Controller runs as follows:
The petitioner is the owner of the premises bearing door No.245 and Door No.248. Coimbatore. The respondent became a tenant under one Mr. Rajagopal previously. The petitioner had purchased the petition schedule property from Rajagopal as per the registered sale deed dated 211. 1985. The tenancy was attorned in favour of the petitioner and the respondent was paying the rents to the petitioner after his purchase. The respondent is in occupation of the premises bearing door No.248 and he is carrying on Hotel Business thereon. The rear portion bearing door No.245 is being used by the respondent for his residential purpose. After the purchase of the petition schedule premises, the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.