SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 19

S.S.M.QUADRI, V.N.KHARE
C. Chandramohan – Appellant
Versus
Sengottaiyan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.-These three appeals, by special leave, arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Madras in C.R.Ps. 3796 to 3798 of 1994 dated November 17, 1997. The common appellant is the landlord and respondents are the tenants of the three shops, Door Nos. 19, 20 and 21, R.K.V. Road, Erode, (hereinafter referred to as the premises ).

2. The facts giving rise to these appeals may be notified here.

The father of the appellant, Late Chockalingam who was the owner, let out the shops on rent bearing-Door No. 19 to T. Subramaniam @ Rs. 75/- per month; Door No. 20 @ Rs. 250/- per month to M. Sengottaiyan who died during the pendency of the proceedings (his legal representatives are brought on record as respondents 2 to 6), and Door No. 21 to Nachimuthu @ Rs. 200/- per month. They are said to be in occupation for the last 25 to 40 years. On June 8, 1978 the said Chockalingam executed release deed (Exhibit P-4) in favour of the appellant and thus he became the absolute owner and landlord of the premises.

3. The landlord claimed that the rent of the shops, Door Nos. 19, 20 and 21, was enhanced to Rs. 400/-, Rs. 850/- and Rs. 700/- respectively. He issued no































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top