SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 1342

S.PALANIVELU
K. Lakshumanaperumal – Appellant
Versus
Sardhar Sheriff – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:T. Karunakaran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V.N. Rajendran, Advocate.

Judgment

1. The petitioner is plaintiff in O.S.No.125 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Court, Salem, who filed the suit against the respondent for specific performance of contract on the basis of an agreement of sale reportedly executed by the respondent. The suit was decreed ex parte on 28.06.2005 and the respondent levied execution proceedings in R.E.P.No.303 of 2005 for execution of sale deed and in the said proceedings also the respondent remained ex parte and the sale deed was executed by the Court and thereafter he filed another petitioner in R.E.P.No.76 of 2007 for delivery of the property in pursuance of the sale deed executed by the Court and in that R.E.P. also the respondent remained ex parte and delivery was ordered, effected and thereafter recorded. Then the E.P. got terminated on 12.07.2007.

2. During the above said execution proceedings, the respondent filed petition in I.A.No.21 of 2008 to set aside the ex parte decree in O.S.No.125 of 2005 passed on 20.8.2006, along with an application to condone the delay of 361 days in filing such application in I.A.No.207 of 2007 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The said petition was dismissed by the learned Principal Subordi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top