K.N.BASHA
S. R. Rajini – Appellant
Versus
Principal, Madurai Law College, Madurai & Others – Respondent
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the first respondent dated 14. 2000 made in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.439/E/2001 cancelling the admission of the petitioner to the five year Bachelor of Law Course for the academic year 1998-99 on the ground of submission of a bogus +2 Mark sheet and consequently, seeking for the relief of a direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to pursue her studies in the fourth and fifth year of B.L. Degree Course at the first respondent college and write the concerned examinations conducted by the fifth respondent.
2. The filing of the petition arising out of the following factual scenario :
The petitioner appeared for the +2 examination held during March 1998 and as per the original mark sheet issued to the petitioner, the petitioner said to have secured 44% marks out of 200 in Mathematics subject. As the petitioner expected more marks she has applied for retotalling of her marks in Mathematics subject by submitting her application dated 16. 1998 to the third respondent herein. The petitioner also paid the necessary fees for retotalling the marks in Mathematics. Thereafter, the petitioner received a letter
3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation V. Virendra Kumar Jayantibhai Patel reported in (1997) 6 SCC 650
5. Veerappa Pillai V. Raman & Raman Ltd. (1952 SCR 583
7. Central Bank of India Ltd. V. Prakash Chand Jain (1969) 1 SCR 735
2. Mukunda Bore V. Bangshidhar Buragohain and others reported in (1980) 4 SCC 336
6. Roop Singh Negi V. Punjab National Bank reported in 2009 (2) SCC 570
8. Kuldeep Singh V. Commissioner of Police and Ors. (1999) 2 SCC 10
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.