P.JYOTHIMANI
A. B. Natarajan & Another – Appellant
Versus
S. Madhavan & Others – Respondent
In all the above writ petitions, the issue involved relates to the selection of candidates for Group-I Services by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) for the year 2000-01, the result of which was published on 28. 2004. W.P.No.30885 of 2004 has been filed by one A.B. Natarajan, who appeared for Group I Examinations, having been selected in the preliminary examinations held in 2001 and in the main examinations held in February, 2002, declared as not selected in the oral test conducted between 26. 2004 to 26. 2004 by the TNPSC, challenging the selection as published on 28. 2004. He has subsequently filed WP.M.P.No.218 of 2007 for impleading one of the selected candidates viz., T.Jayaseelan and the said petition was ordered on 12. 2007. Then, he impleaded other selected candidates as respondents 3 to 92 as per order passed in WP.M.P.No.789 of 2008 dated 24. 2008. As per the direction of Court, he served notice on the respondents 3 to 92 privately out of whom respondents 2, 4 to 6, 11, 14, 16 to 18, 20, 21, 23, 27, 33 to 36, 39, 43, 44, 46, 51 to 55, 57, 61 to 64,67 to 70, 73 to 75, 78,79, 90 and 91 were served and proof of affidavits were filed. However, in resp
7. Dr.M.Vennila v. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission rep. By Deputy Secretary
1. Karnataka Public Service Commission vs. B.M.Vijaya Shankar A.I.R. 1992 SC 952
2. Krishan Singh vs. State of Haryana (1994) 4 SCC 165
3. Central Board of Secondary Education vs. Ms.Vineeta Mahajan and another AIR 1994 SC 733
6. State of U.P.v. S.C. Dixit AIR 2004 SC 163
8. Sanjay Singh and another vs. U.P.Public Service Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.