M.DURAISWAMY
Maragatham @ Krishnammal – Appellant
Versus
Marimuthu – Respondent
The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree in A.S.No. 53 of 1999 on the file of Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.349 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sirkali.
2. The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in the above second appeal. The respondent is the defendant in the suit.
3. The plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.349 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sirkali. for delivery of possession in respect of B schedule property and for past and future mesne profits.
.4. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows:-
.The plaint B schedule property is part of A schedule property and the B schedule property alone is the subject matter of the suit. The plaintiff is the daughter of Lakshmanasamy Nadar, who died in the year 1981. The plaintiffs father Lakshmanasamy Nadar, by virtue of Inam registered sale deed dated 23. 1968, conveyed the A schedule property to the plaintiff. The defendant, who is the brothers son of the said Lakshmanasamy Nadar, was permitted to reside in a portion of A schedule property, which is the suit B schedule property. The rest of the A schedule property is in t
5. Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Government of India and others 2004 (10) SCC 779
3. Chinnaponnu (died) & Another v. Lakshmana Naidu & Others 2002(5) CTC 147
6. A.C.Lakshmipathy and another v. A.M.Chakrapani Reddiar and others 2001(1) CTC 112
7. Avinash Kumar Chauhan v. Vijay Krishna Mishra 2009(1) Scale 80
8. Meethiyan Sidhiqu v. Muhammed Kunju Pareeth Kutty and others 1996(7) SCC 436
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.