B.RAJENDRAN, R.BANUMATHI
Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Vairamuthu & Others – Respondent
R. Banumathi, J.
1. Appellants, who are wife and son of the Respondent, have filed Appeal in A.S. No.547 of 2005 against the Judgment and decree dated 10. 2004 made in O.S. No.12 of 1999, whereby the Family Court declined to order maintenance.
C.M.A. No.960 of 2005 has been filed by the wife against the Judgment and decree dated 10. 2004 made in H.M.O.P. No.410 of1999, where by the Family Court, Coimbatore has allowed the petition for divorce filed by the husband/Respondent on the ground of adultery and cruelty.
2. The Suit O.S.No.12 of 1999 was filed by the 1st Appellant/wife and her son claiming maintenance of Rs.1,500/- per month to herself and Rs.1,350/- to the son till he attains majority and for creation of charge over the suit schedule property viz., 2400 sq.ft or 5 cents and 222 sq.ft. i.e., house site and a house building thereon bearing Door No.10/11 and New No.10/77 in S.F.No.209 of Kuniamuthur, Coimbatore Taluk for enforcing the maintenance decree. Case of Appellants is that the marriage between the 1st Appellant and the Respondent was solemnised on 20.1.1976 at Palani, Sri Palaniandavar temple as per Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage the 1st Appell
11. Dastane (Dr.) v. S. Dastane
1. Naveen Kohli v. Neelu kohli
12. Sobha Rani v. Madhukar Reddi
114. Jayachandra v. Annel Kaur
115. Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh
118. Parveen Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta
119. Chetan Dass v. Kamla Devi
222. Kanchan Devi v. Promod Kumar Mittal
223. A. Jayachandra v. Aneel Kaur
116. Lachhman Uttam Chand Kirpalani v. Meena, AIR 1964 SC 40
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.