High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K. GANGULY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Dr. P. Rajaji
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to the Government, Co-operation & Others
W.A.Nos.932 & 827 of 2008
Decided on : 29-09-2008
Election - Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - G.O.(2D) No.76, dated 11th July, 2007 - Section 182 - The court discussed the impugned governmental order cancelling elections to co-operative societies and the legal provisions under Section 182 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The court highlighted the lack of statutory authority for the government to cancel elections and emphasized the need for adherence to the statutory provisions governing election disputes and the election process.
Fact of the Case:
The government issued an order cancelling elections to co-operative societies in Tamil Nadu, leading to legal challenges by affected parties. The appellants, members of co-operative societies, contested the lack of reasons provided in the order and the absence of statutory provisions enabling the government to cancel elections.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned order lacked statutory authority and did not follow the prescribed procedures under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The court emphasized the need for adherence to statutory provisions governing election disputes and the election process.
Issues: The issues revolved around the legality of the government's order cancelling elections to co-operative societies, the absence of statutory provisions enabling such cancellation, and the failure to follow prescribed procedures under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the impugned order lacked statutory authority and did not follow the prescribed procedures under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The court emphasized the need for adherence to statutory provisions governing election disputes and the election process.
Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned governmental order and the consequential order of the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, and directed the respondents to proceed with the election results and complete the process within two months.
These two appeals have been filed against the common order of the writ Court passed in W.P.Nos.24684 of 2007 and 24424 of 2007 dated 3rd June 2008.
2. Both the writ petitions have been filed challenging the Governmental Order in G.O. (2D)No.76, dated 11th July, 2007 issued by the Secretary to the Government, Department of Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, whereby all the elections held or in progress in Primary, Central and Apex Co-operative Societies in the State of Tamil Nadu commencing from 8th June, 2007 under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 were cancelled. The text of the order dated 11th July, 2007 issued by the Secretary to the Government is set out below:
Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection (CJ1)Department G.O.(2D)No.76 Dated:11.07.2007
Read:
1. G.O.(2D) No.36, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 19.04.2007
2. From the Registrar of Co-operative Societies letter Rc.No.51684/2007/CE1 dated 11.07.2007
ORDER:
In the Government Order read above, orders have been issued for conducting elections to all the primary, central and apex co-operative societies in the State commencing from 8th June, 2007, under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, and the rules made thereunder.
2. It has been brought to the notice of the Government that certain unwanted incidents have occured during these polls. The Government are of the opinion that these incidents have undermined the very purpose of conducting the elections to the cooperative societies in the State. The Government have therefore decided to cancel the elections to the co-operative societies wherever they have been conducted and to hold fresh elections to all the co-operatives after consulting the leaders of all political parties in the Legislature. A new election schedule will be announced by the Government after these consultations.
3. The Registrars of Co-operative Societies are requested to cancel the elections wherever they have been completed or in progress. (By Order of the Governor) S.Machendranathan, Secretary to Government.
3. Challenging the above said governmental order another writ petition in W.P.No.24746 of 2007 has been filed with a similar prayer, and also praying to quash the consequential order passed by the Deputy Registrar, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies, Krishnagiri dated 11.07.2007.
4. All the three writ petitions were heard together, and the learned single Judge by the impugned order dismissed the writ petitions upholding the governmental order quoted herein above.
5. Against the said common order only two appeals have been filed namely., W.A.Nos.932 of 2008 and 827 of 2008 which arose from W.P.Nos.24684 of 2007 and 24424 of 2007 respectively. Therefore, this judgment is confined only to those two writ petitions.
.6. The appellant in W.A.No.932 of 2008 is an advocate and is a member of the Madras Advocates Co-operative Society Ltd. the 3rd respondent herein, which is a registered society under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The said society is running a canteen within the High Court campus for the benefit of the advocates. It has been contended that the said society is governed by the provisions of the said Act and the rules and bye laws framed under the said Act. The management of the said society vests in a Board of 11 Directors elected by the general body once in every 5 years. Thereafter, those Directors elect the relevant office bearers, such as, President, Vice President, Secretaries, Treasurer, etc., to the said society. By a notification dated 19th April, 2007 the Government of Tamil Nadu issued an order for the conduct of election to all co-operative societies in the State. Pursuant to such notification the date for the commencement of election was fixed on 8th June, 2007 under the provisions of the said Act. Initially 31 advocates filed their nominati
15. The State of Andhra Pradesh and another Vs. Lavu Narendra Nath AIR 1971 SC 2560
7. Babaji Kondaji Garad Vs. Nasik Merchants Co-op. Bank Ltd.
9. State of U.P. Vs. C.O.D. Chheoki Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.
11. Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others (1982) 1 SCC 39
4. Surinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1996 SC 1507
8. Daman Singh Vs. State of Punjab (1985) 2 SCC 670
10. Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur Vs. The State of Punjab AIR 1955 SC 549
12. Satwant Singh Sawhney Vs. Dr.Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport Officer, Government of India
13. Dhananjay Malik and Others Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Others (2008) 4 SCC 171
16. State of M.P. Vs. Kumari Nivedita Jain AIR 1981 SC 2045
14. State of Sikkim Vs. Dorjee Tshering Bhutia and Others (1991) 4 SCC 243
1. Kuldip Nayar Vs. Union of India (2006)7 SCC 1
2. Mohinder Singh Gill Vs. Chief Election Commissioner AIR 1978 SC 851
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.