K.CHANDRU
Adivaram Varthagargal Sangam Palani, rep. by its Secretary & Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary & Others – Respondent
These writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Sections 78, 79(3) and 109 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (Act 22 of 1959) (for short, the HR & CE Act) as amended by Tamil Nadu Act 39 of 1996 as well as by Act 28 of 2003 as ultra vires the Constitution. For the sake of convenience, sections 78, 79 and 109 of the HR & CE Act, as amended, may be extracted below:-
Section 78 : Encroachment by persons on land or building belonging to charitable or religious institution or endowment and the eviction of encroachers.-(1) Where the Assistant Commissioner having jurisdiction either suo motu or upon a complaint made by the trustee has reason to believe that any person has encroached upon (hereinafter in this section referred to as encroacher”) any land, building, tank, well, spring or watercourse or any space wherever situation belonging to the religious institution or endowment (hereinafter referred to as the property”), he shall report the fact together with relevant particulars to the Joint Commissioner having jurisdiction over the division in which the religious institution or endowment is situated.
Explanation.- For the pur
1. A.A.Gopalkrishnan Vs. Cochin Devaswom Board and others 2007 (7) SCC 482
3. The State of Punjab and another -vs- Khan Chand AIR 1974 SC 543
6. Rajanarayanaperumal Temple -vs- Rethinam Pillai (1979) 1 MLJ 159
9. Bishwanath -vs- Radha Ballabhji AIR 1967 SC 1044
10. Workmen of Meenakshi Mills Ltd. & others v. Meenakshi Mills Ltd. and another (1992) 3 SCC 336
11. S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India (1990) 4 SCC 594
12. State of M.P. -vs- G.C.Mandawar (1955) 1 SCR 599: AIR 1954 SC 493
113. Sant Lal Bharati V. State of Punjab (1988) 1 SCC 366: (1988) 2 SCR 107
114. State of Tamil Nadu and others Vs. Ananthi Ammal and others 1995(1) S.C.C.519
116. Papnasam Labour Union Vs. Madura Coats Ltd and another (1995) 1 SCC 501
117. Chintaman Rao V. State of M.P. 1950 SCR 759
119. Jyoti Pershad V. Administrator for Union Territory of Delhi
20.20. State of Madras V. V.G.Row
221. Fatehchand Himmatlal V. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.