SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 2930

R.BANUMATHI
L. Ganesh Balaiah – Appellant
Versus
The Director General of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Thamodaran, Advocate.
For the Respondent:P. Muthukumar, Govt. Advocate (Writs).

Judgment :-

Petitioner seeks Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the Proceedings of the Respondent dated 02.02.2004 made in Proceedings No.Rc.080992/Appointment 3/2003 and directing the Respondent to appoint the Petitioner as Grade-II Police Constable based on his application.

2. Petitioner applied for the post of Police Constable Grade-II for the year 2003 and his registration number is 2801088. Petitioner cleared written test and he was declared as passed. On the basis of written test, Petitioner was asked to appear for physical fitness and Petitioner came up successful in medical fitness also. But the Petitioner was not appointed. By the impugned Proceedings dated 02.02.2004, Petitioner was informed that he was involved in Panankudi Police Station Cr.No.11/1998 under Sec.323 and 324 IPC and that he was acquitted giving him benefit of doubt and Rule 14(b) of Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rules (for short Rules) would be applicable and therefore, he was not appointed.

3. Respondent filed counter stating that as per Rule 14(b), no person shall be eligible for appointment by direct recruitment unless he satisfies the appointing authority that his character and a

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top