SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 1732

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State by Station House Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. A. Stalin, P. Vajraveli, Advocates.
For the Respondent:R. Muniapparaj, Govt Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Tract Court No.I), Cuddalore at Chidambaram dated 110. 2005 made in Criminal Appeal No.40/2005 confirming the judgment of conviction pronounced by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chidambaram in C.C.No.54/2004 dated 29.03.2005 and the punishment imposed thereon.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the Criminal Revision Case are as follows:-

Based on the complaint of P.W.1, a case was registered in Crime No.3/2004 on the file of All Women Police Station, Chidambaram against the petitioner herein for an alleged offence punishable under Section 417 of IPC. The Inspector of Police of the said Police Station, after investigation, submitted a final report on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chidambaram alleging that the petitioner herein had committed offences punishable under Sections 417 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and praying that he should be prosecuted and punished for the said offences. The same was taken on file as C.C.No.54/2004 by the said Magistrate. Necessary charges were framed and the petitioner herein (accused in the said














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top