S.TAMILVANAN
The Diocese of Tirunelveli (C. S. I) rep. By its Bishop, Bishop Stowe & Others – Appellant
Versus
The Church of South India rep. by its Moderator & Others – Respondent
All the Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred against the orders passed in the Interlocutory Applications filed in O.S.No.2898 of 2008 on the file of the II Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
.2. It is an admitted fact that all these impugned orders and the corresponding Civil Revision Petitions are relating to the suit in O.S.No.2898 of 2008, which was filed by the respondents 2 to 59 in CRP (PD) Nos.2527 to 2529 of 2008 as plaintiffs of the suit, under Order VII Rule 1 CPC, seeking Judgment and Decree in favour of the plaintiffs for declaration that they have been duly elected as the office bearers of the Church Council and Diocesan Council of the second defendant, the Diocese of Tirunelveli (C.S.I), represented by its Bishop and also for consequential permanent injunction restraining the said second defendant, its men, subordinates, agents etc., from interfering in any manner with the plaintiffs discharging their duties and performing their function including in the matter of appointment and transfer of teachers in schools and colleges of the second defendant Diocese. The respondents 2 to 59 being the plaintiffs in the suit filed Interlocutory Application in
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Vellore vs. A. Krishnan
Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd., vs. R. Sakthivel
Sivasubramanian, J. vs. N. Govindarajan
Rani Mohanraj and another vs. P. Rajarathinam
Rani Mohanraj and other vs. P. Rajarathinam
Arjun Singh vs. Mohindra Kumar and Others
A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu vs. S. Chellappan
Indian Bank vs. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.