K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
S. V. Doraisamy – Appellant
Versus
T. Dayalan – Respondent
1. Both the revisions arise out of the judgment in C.M.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2000 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamalee dismissing the order in I.A.Nos.325 and 326 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Tambaram.
2. The plaintiff filed I.A.Nos.325 of 1999 under Order 39, Rule 1, C.P.C. for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the alleged peaceful possession of the suit property by him pending the suit and the application in I.A.No.326 of 1999 was filed praying for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from alienating encumbering or registering any document in respect of B schedule properties till the disposal of the application. The trial Court dismissed both the applications. On appeal also, both C.M.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2000 on the file of Sub-Court, Poonamallee, were dismissed. Hence, the present two revision petitions by the plaintiff.
3. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for a permanent injunction claiming to be in possession and enjoyment of the property. The plaint B schedule property forms part of the plaint A schedule property. The property belongs to defendants 1 to 7. The plaintiff entered into an agreemen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.