P.SATHASIVAM
S. HARSHAVARDHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
P. SATHASIVAM, J.
1. THE petitioner challenges the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents 1 and 2 on various grounds. In W. P. No. 13247/2001, the petitioner seeks to quash Notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dated 3. 11. 1999 and Declaration dated 18. 9. 2000 as well as Award No. 1/2000 dated 30. 12. 2000 in so far as his land to an extent of 2. 79.5 Hectares in Veerapuram village, chingleput Taluk, Kancheepuram District and prays for quashing of the entire acquisition proceedings and restore the said extent of land to him.
2. THE very same petitioner in W. P. No. 13248 of 2001 challenges Notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of his land in 88, thenmelpakkam village of an extent of 1. 55. 0 hectares.
3. THE case of the petitioner is briefly stated hereunder :-According to him, he purchased
4. 34. 5 hectares extent of land in veerapuram and Thenmelpakkam villages, chingleput Taluk in the year 1996 on a sale consideration of Rs. 70 lakhs. Of this land, 2. 79. 5 hectares are the subject-matter of w. P. No. 13247/2001 and 1. 55. 0 hectares are the subject-matter in W. P.
State of Gujarat v. Chaturbhai
H.M.T.House Building Co-op Society v. Syed Khader
H.M.T.House Building Co-op Society v. M.Venkataswamappa
General Government Servants Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Wahab Uddin
R.L.Arora v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Fomento R. and H. Ltd. v. Gustavo Ranato da Cruz Pinto
Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. The State of Haryana and Ors.
Executive Engineer, Jal Nigam C.S. Division, U.P. v. S.N.Juyal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.