SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 138

P.SATHASIVAM, P.THANGAVEL
P. ANWER BATCHA – Appellant
Versus
TAMILARASAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:K.S. Narasimhan, V.M. Ravichandran Advocates.

Judgment :

P. SATHASIVAM, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the award of the Motor Accidents Claims tribunal (Additional District Judge-cum-Chief judicial Magistrate), Pudukkottai in m. C. O. P. No. 181 of 1993, dated 10. 1. 96, the owner and the insurer of the vehicle in question have filed the above appeal questioning the 'negligence' and 'quantum of compensation' arrived at by the Tribunal in respect of death of one Jayaraman in a motor vehicle accident that took place at 6 a. m. , on 26. 6. 1992, the wife, children and parents of the deceased have prayed for a compensation of Rs. 15,00,000. The Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 10. 1. 96 passed an award for Rs. 5,60,000 with interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. Questioning the said award, the owner of the Ambassador car No. TN 31-Z 0270 and his insurer, that is, National insurance Co. Ltd. preferred the above appeal. Claimants have preferred Cross-objection no. 10 of 2001 for further sum of Rs. 4,40,000 in addition to the amount already granted.

( 2 ) HEARD the learned counsel for appellants as well as respondents.

( 3 ) EVEN at the outset Mr. K. S. Narasimhan, learned counsel
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top