1. The petitioner has filed this petition, aggrieved by the order of impleading the respondents as defendants in the suit.

2. The petitioner filed the suit O.S.No.7583 of 2000 for a declaration that the notice dated 9.8.2000 issued by the 4th respondent herein was invalid, for a consequential injunction restraining the 4th respondent from demolishing the suit property and for a declaration that the notice dated 27.10.2000 issued by the third respondent was invalid and for the similar relief of consequential injunction as referred to above. The respondents 3 and 4 were originally the only defendants in the suit. The petitioner and the respondents 1 and 2 have a long history of litigation. Originally there was a lease agreement dated 22.5.1985 between the petitioner and one Babu Pillai and his brother Ranga Pillai. They granted a lease in favour of the petitioner in respect of the suit property. As per Clause 1 of the agreement the petitioner was given permission to put up construction in the suit property and carry on her hotel business.

The respondents 1 and 2 herein are the wife and daughter of the said Babu Pillai; the respondents 5 and 6 herein are the sons of Babu Pi